New York Family Law Blog

In 2021, both Alex Wright and Sanchel Burke filed custody petitions in the Family Court, Kings County. The case involved their child, who had moved with the mother from Brooklyn to Binghamton. The father sought sole legal and physical custody, and the mother also sought sole legal and physical custody. A key question was whether the court could require the mother to move back to New York City as a condition of keeping custody. The court was also tasked with setting a parental access schedule for the father that took into account the child’s best interests.

Background Facts
The parties never married and are the parents of one child. The father lived in Brooklyn, while the mother and child moved to Binghamton in 2021. Following that move, both parents filed petitions for sole legal and physical custody.

In March 2023, after a hearing, the Family Court awarded the mother sole legal and physical custody. However, the order included two conditions: that the mother relocate with the child back to New York City and that the child be enrolled in a school in Brooklyn within a 20-minute commute from the father’s residence. The court stated that if the mother did not meet these conditions, custody would be transferred to the father.

In February 2022, Emily F. filed a petition in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, seeking to modify a 2017 final order of custody and visitation. She requested permission to relocate her child from New York to North Carolina over the objection of the father, Victor P. The case came before the court on remittal from the Appellate Division for a new fact-finding hearing. The court considered testimony, documentary evidence, and the relocation standard in New York, which requires the moving parent to show that the relocation is in the child’s best interests.

Background Facts
Emily F. and Victor P. were previously married and lived in the Bronx between 2013 and 2016. They separated in 2016 after incidents of domestic violence. The 2017 custody order, issued on consent, gave the mother sole legal and physical custody and provided the father with parenting time. The mother lost her job at New York University in 2020 due to budget cuts and searched extensively for employment in New York, applying for over 65 positions. When she was unable to find work, she began looking in North Carolina, where she had family. In February 2022, she received an offer from Duke University and relocated with the child in June 2022.

Since the move, the child has been living in a gated community, performing well in school, participating in tutoring and athletic activities, and maintaining friendships. The father’s parenting time has been inconsistent, with missed opportunities during several school breaks and holidays. The mother offered to pay travel costs and proposed a schedule that included substantial time in New York and North Carolina. The child expressed a preference to remain in North Carolina while continuing to spend time with the father. The father did not testify or present evidence during the hearing.

In Matter of Shayne FF. v. Julie GG., the Appellate Division, Third Department, reviewed a Family Court order that dismissed a father’s petitions to modify an existing custody and visitation arrangement. The case raised issues about what a parent must prove to change a prior custody order, how the court should evaluate alleged changes in a child’s needs over time, and the importance of considering transportation arrangements and holiday parenting time when circumstances shift. It also examined how a court should interpret relocation clauses in prior orders and the correct legal standard for deciding a motion to dismiss at the close of a petitioner’s case.

Background Facts
The parents had one child, born in 2009. In 2012, they entered a consent order granting the mother sole legal custody and the father parenting time every other weekend, along with holiday time “as agreed between the parties.” The order prohibited the mother from moving more than 50 miles from her then-current home without the father’s consent or a court order.

In May 2020, the father filed a petition to modify custody, alleging that the mother had moved to another county in violation of the order and that her move increased the travel time for exchanges. He also claimed she had not agreed to holiday parenting time. The mother sought dismissal, and the father later filed an amended petition in March 2021.

In Matter of Scotto v. Alexander, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reviewed a Family Court decision denying a father’s request to relocate with his children from New York to South Carolina. The case addressed the legal standard for relocation, the factors courts must consider when a custodial parent seeks to move with children, and how the evidence presented can affect the court’s determination. It also involved questions about the economic, educational, and family support implications of relocation, as well as how parental access schedules can be adapted to maintain the noncustodial parent’s relationship with the children.

Background Facts
The parents, who were never married, had two children, born in 2012 and 2016. In April 2017, they entered into a so-ordered stipulation of settlement that gave the father sole legal and residential custody of the children. The stipulation provided the mother with supervised parental access.

The father and children lived in a home in New York that belonged to the father’s grandmother. In November 2021, the father filed a petition to modify the 2017 stipulation to allow him to relocate with the children to South Carolina. He testified that he could no longer continue renting his grandmother’s house and that the mother contributed only $25 per month in child support for both children.