Close

New York Family Law Blog

Updated:

Does the SUNY cap apply in determining parental contribution to educational expenses?  Pamela T. v. Marc B., 930 N.Y.S.2d 857 (2011)

In New York, as part of a divorce and child support settlement, parents can be required to contribute to their children’s educational expenses.  The SUNY Cap attempts to limit the required contribution of both parents to the cost of State University of New York (SUNY) tuition. In Pamela T. v.…

Updated:

New York Supreme Court discussed the concept of zones of final decision-making authority in point custody situations.  J.R. v. M.S., 55 N.Y.S.3d 873 (2017)

Child-rearing decisions are often challenging when couples divorce or otherwise end their romantic relationship.  In some cases, there is so much animosity between parents that they are unable to effectively communicate with respect to the needs of the child. In J.R. v. M.S., the New York Supreme Court was asked…

Updated:

Appellate Division determined that child support payments may be suspended if the custodial parent unjustifiably prevented access to the child. Usack v. Usack, 17 A.D.3d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Generally, child support and custody are two different issues.  Parental access is not based on the amount of child support is paid or whether it is paid on time or is in arrears.  This means that a parent who has been ordered to pay chid support cannot stop paying child…

Updated:

A family court can grant a protection order prohibiting a minor from contacting a child, even though the minor is too young for criminal prosecution.  Emily K. v. Luis J., 997 N.Y.S. 2d 510 (2014)

In New York, a family court proceeding, pursuant to Article 8, allows a petitioner, the opportunity to civilly address an action that would otherwise be a crime. A family court proceeding under Article 8 is entirely different from a criminal prosecution for the same types of allegations, or even the exact…

Updated:

The ICWA is applicable to the adoption of a Native American child even if the child’s Native American parents do not participate in tribal life. In re Baby Boy C., 805 N.Y.S.2d 313 (2005)

The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) was enacted in response to practices that separated large numbers of Native American children from their families and tribe. See 25 USC § 1901 et seq. It is common for representatives from the relevant Indian tribe to intervene in child custody proceedings involving Indian…

Updated:

New York Supreme Court considered a divorce petition even though a divorce was already granted in another state. Weiss v. Weiss, 29 Misc. 3d 1202(A) (2010)

A divorce proceeding must be initiated in the state where at least one of the parties is domiciled.  Not only must one of the parties be domiciled in the state where the divorce proceeding is initiated, the person must have met the minimum residency requirements. In Weis v. Weis, because…

Updated:

Appellate Division found that a trial court cannot confirm a custody order that was determined by arbitration. Schechter v. Schechter, 63 A.D.3d 817, 881 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2009)

In Schechter v. Schechter, the court considered whether a religious arbitration tribunal could determine child custody and whether the Supreme Court could then confirm the arbitration decision. Background David Schechter, the plaintiff and Wendy Zehava Schechter, the defendant entered into an agreement pursuant to which they agreed to arbitrate all…

Updated:

A fault-based divorce should not be granted without sufficient proof of constructive abandonment. Molinari v. Molinari, 2007 WL 1119894 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. 2007)

Fault divorce is granted when one spouse proves that the other spouse did something which resulted in the failure of the marriage. Under New York Domestic Relations Law, grounds for fault-based divorce include: Cruel and inhuman treatment. DRL §170.1 Abandonment for a continuous period of one year or more. DRL §170.2 Imprisonment…

Updated:

New York recognizes the same-sex of marriage validly entered into outside of New York. Beth R. v. Donna M., 853 N.Y.S.2d 501 (2008)

At the time that this case was decided, New York did not recognize same sex marriage. The law changed on June 24, 2011. Before that time, it was common for same sex couples to get married outside of New York in jurisdictions that did recognize same sex marriage.  Just like…

Updated:

Separation and Property Settlement Agreement Prepared by Mediator Was Not Unconscionable- Irizarry v Hayes, 2020 NY Slip Op 50217(U)

In this case the Supreme Court considered whether the terms of a separation agreement prepared by a non-attorney mediator were unconscionable and as a result should be voided. A separation agreement is a document agreed to by a husband and wife in which they agree to the conditions related to…

Contact Us