Published on:

Willful Violation of Child Support Order. Wanda R.F. v. Marc A.C., 222 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

by

In a recent case before the Family Court of New York County, the court affirmed findings that the respondent father willfully violated a support order dating back to 2010.

In New York, a willful violation of child support occurs when a parent fails to comply with a court-ordered child support obligation without a justifiable excuse. According to Family Court Act § 454(3)(a), a parent is deemed to have willfully violated a support order if they have the means to provide support but fail to do so without a valid reason.

The statute places the burden of proof on the party alleging the willful violation to demonstrate that the non-compliant parent had the ability to meet their support obligation. This can be established through evidence of the parent’s financial means, employment status, and any other relevant factors. Once the prima facie showing of willful violation is made, the burden shifts to the non-compliant parent to provide evidence justifying their failure to pay support.

Furthermore, Family Court Act § 454(3)(b) outlines certain factors that the court may consider in determining whether a violation of a support order is willful. These factors include the parent’s employment status, earning capacity, and financial resources, as well as any other relevant circumstances. Importantly, the court may also consider the parent’s past payment history and efforts to obtain employment or otherwise meet their support obligation.

It’s essential to note that a willful violation of child support can have serious legal consequences, including potential enforcement actions by the court. These actions may include income withholding, contempt proceedings, and even incarceration in cases of repeated or egregious non-compliance.

Background Facts

The case involves a support order issued on May 5, 2010, which the respondent father allegedly willfully violated. Despite being directed to pay support, the father failed to do so, citing his inability to work due to supporting another child and a chronic health condition. However, he provided insufficient medical evidence to support his claim of being unable to work. The mother presented evidence of the father’s non-compliance with the support order, prompting the court to assess the father’s credibility and determine whether he willfully violated the order.

Issue
Whether the respondent father willfully violated the support order dated May 5, 2010, and if so, what consequences should follow from this violation.

Holding
The court affirmed the finding that the respondent father willfully violated the support order. However, the portion of the order directing him to be incarcerated unless he paid a purge amount was dismissed as academic, as the period of incarceration had already expired.

Rationale
The court’s decision to affirm the finding of willful violation of the support order was based on several key factors. Firstly, the father failed to rebut the mother’s prima facie showing of his non-compliance with the support order. Despite claiming an inability to work due to health issues and supporting another child, the father did not provide sufficient medical evidence to support his claim. His admission of not paying support as directed further weakened his position and contributed to the court’s determination of willful violation.

Additionally, the court assessed the father’s credibility in light of the evidence presented. Finding no reason to disturb the credibility assessment made by the Family Court, the court upheld the determination that the father willfully violated the support order. This rationale underscores the importance of parties adhering to court directives and providing adequate evidence when contesting claims of non-compliance.

In summary, the court’s rationale for affirming the finding of willful violation was grounded in the father’s failure to rebut the mother’s evidence and his admission of non-payment. It highlights the importance of parties fulfilling their support obligations and presenting credible evidence in legal proceedings.

Conclusion
The court’s decision highlights the importance of compliance with support orders in family law matters. Willful violation of such orders can have serious consequences, including incarceration. When facing family law matters such as support orders, seeking the guidance of an experienced New York family lawyer is crucial. Contacting a knowledgeable attorney can help navigate the complexities of family court proceedings and ensure that your rights are protected.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

Comments are closed.

Contact Information